Posted on August 5th 2011
White Virtues, White Vices
By Alex Linder
Article in NYT about the marrige of a nunish anti-chick. She's a Berrigan. You might remember that name from the '60s. Big anti-war name, a Catholic, or ex-Catholic, liberal trying to end Vietnam and everything else wrong with the world. This plainstress, Frida, is his daughter. What's notable here is the striking Whiteness of both the way the woman lives, for both good and bad. She has that monkish ability to live solidly for a cause, yet that misdirected spirit that leads her to devote her time and substantial brainpower to the service of something destructive. So many whites are like this, it's really sad that something as insane, factually baseless, and utterly destructive as christ-insanity managed to become the main spiritual channel for our race over the last two millennia of our existence. It is a genuine tragedy that Christ-lunacy became common in White lands. Seeking a contemplative place, she signed up to work and live in the Lower East Side headquarters of the Catholic Worker Movement, whose mission is to help the poor and homeless. Ms. Berrigan’s bedroom there was so small, it could not fit a bed, only a sleeping bag. “No bed bugs!” she said cheerily. She cooked and served lunch to the homeless, and provided them with everything from fresh clothes to long conversations. Ms. Berrigan has bright blue eyes that rarely dart around when she is in conversation. Although she often discusses serious topics — banning nuclear weapons, the conditions at prison camps — she has a way of treading across them very lightly, like a deer. So we see that Berrigan is a serious woman, what with her steady gaze, and her christlike devotion to helping the poor. But helping scum is not a worthwhile occupation, as worthwhile as it undoubtedly can be to place something other than money-seeking as the prime object of ones life. And the fact that one is serious does not mean one isn't a fool, isn't wrong, isn't delusional, isn't to be mocked and laughed at. It's a racial-cultural flaw that Whites possess in spades, the inability to distinguish between what is actually serious and the outward appearance. Jews say, goyim are polite to one another because they can't tell if they're being screwed. Ie, they're dumb. Another way of hitting at roughly the same idea is the saying, you can fake being serious, but you can't fake being funny. What a sad and terrible thing it is that such a large portion of the White mental elite believe helping worthless scumbags is nobler than doing something useful. Only christ-insanity could have led these people to make such a mistake. Christ-insanity and liberalism are often opposed, as are Christ-insanity and the so-called Enlightenment. But in fact, they are two extremely similar versions of the same thing. They're both wrong, and they both suck. ... Lots of inadvertent humor in this piece, too: The couple had their first real date on Valentine’s Day 2010. They went to Brooklyn Bowl in Williamsburg, but mostly talked. “She’s smart, she knows herself, she has a ridiculous vocabulary,” he said. “She can out-talk most people in any debate simply by using words no one else can understand.” Is that how debates are won? By using words "no one else" can understand? Sounds like her "long conversations" with hobos are starting to rub off on her, you ask me. This is good, though: "“From very early on,” she said, “I would look at him and think: This is someone I want a family with. This is a person I want to grow old with. This is the person I want to struggle with.”After four months of dating, he formally proposed to her in his own informal way. “I said, ‘I don’t have a ring, I don’t have a plan, but I want to marry you,’ ” he remembered.
She recalled: “I said yes because Patrick makes me feel really happy and safe and inspired all at the same time. I said yes because I learn a lot from him, and not just about the Red Sox.”She also said yes because he never tried to take her out to big fancy dinners or buy her expensive things. “Part of our vows to one another is wanting freedom, and part of being free is living simply and not being encumbered by stuff,” said Ms. Berrigan, who moved in with Mr. Sheehan-Gaumer last November. “That is something I learned from my family. You really don’t need a lot of stuff to be happy.” Most Americans never figure that out. To most Americans, accumulating money is the number-one goal of life, practically its only meaning. They really do believe that any philosophy that doesn't worship, respect and seek money is a form of hippiedom. Well, in fact, they don't actually believe that anybody doesn't share their view. They simply can't make sense of anybody who looks at life the way la Berrigan does. Protestants in particular, even more than Catholics, have tended to see material success as proof of God's blessing, hence been double-hot to achieve it, at least that's the theory among certain sociologists. It's sad that so many people make what niggers call the paper caper the be-all and end-all; but it's also sad that among those who reject that central purpose such a large percentage opts for something even worse: helping shitbags. Most so-called homeless people are drunks, druggies or crazies. Really, very little can be done about it. What if even merely 100 women nationwide with the character and brains of a Berrigan devoted their substantial energies toward creating a curriculum tailored to the needs of our race's children? Isn't that a more beautiful, logical, practical, and useful way to spend one's time than helping crazy hobos or unelevatable colored sprogs? Even the anti-acquisitive are merely the photo-negative of the dollar chasers. If they're going to help life's losers, by god, they're going to help the loseriest losers they can dig out of the swamp beneath the barrel. That means niggers and assorted third-world scum. It never means doing something MODEST and practical that the WORLD (by world, I mean jewish mass media) celebrates: helping people who can actually use the help; people, young whites, whose lives will result in a multiplier-effect return for the effort bestowed on them. Whereas the sullen sepia sprogs will require help their whole lives long. Unlike even animals, helped niggers will never even be able to be released safely and successfully back into the wild. I guess it falls under Lenin's 'the best way to control the opposition is to lead it,' and that goes for life patterns too. The main life pattern is money acquisition, but the main ALTERNATIVE life pattern is set by the same people: helping useless, destructive, sociocidal coloreds. Verily I say unto you demi-nitwits: there is another way. Nay, there be many other ways.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/fa...20%20%20ed=all
[ The above is from a blog posting. ]