Posted on May 2nd 2017
NY Mag Runs Longest Piece(s) on Alt-Right Yet
By Alex Linder
[ The following is from a blog posting. ]
Deliberately misrepresenting it to fool people. Dozens of writers/analysts all ignore that alt-right either means white racialism or nothing. Dozens of analysts/writers, yet not one mentions that the alt-right is uniformly anti-jew. I believe this is the most significant thing about the entire article. It's not one article, it's a bunch, from many different people. Not one of them observes that the 'alt-right' sees jews as a big problem, let alone as The Problem. Don't tell me that people who are aware of myriad insigificant details related to the movement aren't consciously avoiding mentioning the heart of it. It's deliberate misrepresentation. NYM doesn't want young whites to realize that exciting young whites see jews as The Problem. This report has the form of an 'explainer,' but in fact it is an attempted reframing. Similar to what (((Milo))) did in his Breitbart piece. He at least mentioned the anti-jew stuff, he just treated it as a joke. In other words, he lied. Flat out, straight up, with full knowledged lied. Of course, he's a jew. It what dey do. So these NY Mag sids n squids try to cast alt-right as the latest irrational irruption of White Supremacy, that old tyme hate religion. Like every other jew source, they can't admit whites have interests, like other groups. No, if whites pretend they have interests, it's only a ruse to lubricate their screwing of other groups, which is their nature and their history. This is monstrously absurd, but it is a charade explanation they have kept up with a straight face for, what, 100 years now? The term 'racism,' which was intended to destroy the west, was created by jew Trotsky roughly ninety years ago, a longer running shitsmear than Cats on Broadway. So racialism today as alt-right is some kind of neo-paleoconservatism, which they can semi-plausibly, but dishonestly and inaccurately claim, by pointing to its origins with (((Paul Gottfried))) and his former employee Richard Spencer. There was a day in living memory, about ten years ago, when jew Gottfried instructed Spencer to "Get them down," them being pro-white comments that kicked the ass of the paleocons at Takimag. (White Nationalists were posting there, me included, but others mainly, making the paleocons look like the feeble losers they are. Indeed, Gottfried has used my coinage Faileocons in one of his articles.) We have that command linked at VNNForum, although I don't have it to hand. But that's the milieu that Gottfried/Spencer's alternative right/alt-right emerged from. The jews and jew-turned goyeem at NY Mag try to obscure two main things: whites have no interest in continued forced association with jews/coloreds via the unkind offices of the United States of America's central government; 2) every last tadpole on the 'alt-right' recognizes that jews are the root of the problem their race faces. Of course, jews like those producing NY Mag can't allow consideration of either point. If you acknowledge whites have interests, then something called white racialism or white nationalism or alt-right inevitably takes the shape it does. But they can't do this - it's impolitic. If they treated whites honestly, they open themselves to a thousand rational points - points they can't answer. So they always call anyone not anti-white a 'White supremacist,' in order to keep up the charade that white interests are inherently invalid, and that anyone pretending otherwise is only doing it out of malicious desire to hurt other races (which is all whites ever do, according to the jewish Big Lie presented as history to innocent school children). Forgive my pleonasm. These points do bear repeating. From NY Mag. To understand this new right, it helps to see it not as a fringe movement, but a powerful counterculture. That makes sense. It's opposition to the (((Bolshesphere))). Look at the graphic. Look at all those jews. Conclusion: the jews at NY Mag are trying to sell you that jews are part of the 'alt-right.' Remember that jews always operate "by way of deception," which is literally the motto of Mossad. So all these jews slide into any new thing, as jews try to create personalities and front groups. Molyneaux is a full-blooded jew - he says on tape his mother was a jew, in Berlin of all places. Gee, doesn't look the part, does he? But he is. Then there's Milo. He's a jew too. Even says he's not part of the alt-right. But somehow he's lumped in there. Remember the old saw we talked about in the early 2000s, it remains true: any group that doesn't exclude jews and name them the enemy will in time be taken over by them. Ignore it at your peril, and watch the alt-right become just another safe, feckless, impotent Conservatism 2.0 or 3.0 or 85.0.