Posted on February 15th 2011
On "appeal" and religion
By Alex Linder
[ The following is from a forum thread posting. ]
The above was to the point that alienating christ-cultists, or winning them over, are irrelevant to the WN cause, as those christlings will neither make valuable allies, since they are weak under pressure, nor dangerous enemies, for the same reason. Wherever among the cult are real men, we trust them to figure out what is wrong, and join our cause, without our needing to appeal to them by any other means than our standard methods.
Again, consider my aphorism against received WN 'wisdom': only the unappealing need to appeal.
WN is an appealing cause, therefore it does NOT need to appeal to others, any more than a beautiful woman needs to call up men looking for dates.
If you want to play the Gay Waiter, and pursue the Gay Waiter Strategy of selling long island iced teas to bored housewives, join Warmfront, or the 1001 fools screeching out to the bored mass-morons by means of sucking up to them.
The GWS reminds me of a convention I covered when I was a trade journalist. A sweaty, desperate PR guy tried to dragoon me into a press conference for his company's new product. I said, no, that product simply isn't related to the stuff I write about, so it's irrelevant to my readers. Poor guy, he was no doubt going to have an empty launch (there are many of these launches at the average trade convention, release of softgrades upgrades or new, minor products), and no doubt get chewed out by a senior exec for failing to drum up any interest.
Well, the desperation in that guy, the flopsweat, is what I sense when I read these clever tuckers who are going to "sell" WN by, basically, acting like faggots. We have to "appeal" to "voters." You know how you appeal to women? By being a man. A man has inherent appeal to women. Why women? Because the masses are feminine. Not little old non-dictator, non-electee me saying that, Mr. Hitler saying that. A gay waiter has no inherent appeal to women, he has to pitch his wares, hard, and repeatedly to get them to buy, and when they do, their heart still isn't really in it. WN is for men. Men and their women/children/familes - their clans. Republican Partyism is for faggots - literal faggots, wide-stancers, bathroom queers, and male cheerleading dicksuckers like George (I'm not kidding, his last name really is) Bush. The Republicans are the true party of the bush - male queers, bushmen as equals, and reaching out to women. Why in the world WN would wish to dupe these disgusting degenerates is beyond me. The party was formed to liberate the nigger; it will hardly be the tool of our own liberation.
If WN is nothing more than something to be voted on, then it's not worth our time.
But no, WN is not up for vote. The survival of our race is to be guaranteed by any means necessary, and when you act like our success is based on selling jaded, bored, middle-class consumers that we are Republicans 2.0, you do the cause a disservice and make yourself appear a desperate fool.
Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination. -William L. Pierce
The quotation from Pierce is right on target.
If the masses are feminine, as Hitler said, then what they respect is strength - as Hitler also said. So WN need not to appeal to people, they need to appear strong, and to actually be strong. As others have said, it's not that people disagree with us, they don't have profound beliefs, for the most part, they sway with the political winds. And we can even cite their behavioral tendencies as proof they are more WN than not, when it comes to the most intimate choices (mates and living location).
But they certainly are not heroes, nor are they idealists. If there's much of a cost to a position, they simply won't take it. To say the least, there is a cost to the WN position today. So right now, our business is attracting those undaunted by that cost. Enough of those, the cause becomes strong, the public sees it to be strong, and the cards flip from one side to the other.
That's how it works.
It is an entirely different picture of things than the "we'll get 'em by changings our positions, dress, speech, behavior until we find the one that clicks." Which is a fundamental misconception of the problem before us.